6 The Remix WIP
Art as a medium of exclusion, resistance, or layered meaning
"Antony Gormley installing in Londonderry, Northern Ireland in 1987, during the Troubles. He intended his work to be ‘a poultice, and a benign piece that related to the feelings of the people in that place and their situation’, he remembers the vigorous attack on the work as it was being placed in the ground. ‘They were throwing stones and sticks and then spitting on the sculpture. The sculpture came over the top dripping with saliva, the missiles kept coming.’ The work was eventually doused in petrol and set alight. Gormley continues, ‘This was excellent. This was the work as poultice throwing violence and evil onto itself that would otherwise be experienced in other ways.’"
Exclusion:
It was removed from exhibition at the National Gallery of Victoria after it was attacked, using a hammer.
Resistance:
Blasphemy: an irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable.
"Blasphemous and grossly sacrilegious" - The Roman Catholic Archbishop, George Pell
"There comes a point ... where there is less and less respect being shown for the sacred in whatever form the sacred comes, and you have to draw a line" - Keith Rayner, the Anglican Archbishop
"The conjunction of the sacred symbol and excrement is recognised universally as deeply insulting" - Archbishop George Pell
Layered Meaning:
"(I try) to make the images as seductive and beautiful as possible" - Serrano
There is a tension between the sensuous pleasures of the golden light, and a knowledge of its (claimed) source. People might be 'seduced' by the beauty of the material they would normally find disgusting outside of the context of the gallery
"The artist tried to represent a disembodied, immaterial reality. All suggestions of corporeality were carefully avoided; human forms are seen in geometric abstractions. At this time an anonymous monk introduced the gold background into Western painting as a device to remove the portrayed events from the temporal." - Karsten Harries
"(The work is) deceptive, (it shows) an image of radiant salvation actually fabricated from filth." - New York journalist
"Yet Serrano claims not to have intended an insult. By commenting that he was taught by Catholic Sisters 'that we worship not the crucifix but Christ', he emphasises the disconnection of a symbol and any metaphysical reality it might represent. It is the symbol that has been immersed, not the person. By insisting on this separation, Serrano actually points up the problematic features of the crucifix as an object of devotion."
Moreover, art allows ambiguity, or layers of interpretation, that facilitate multiple understandings, as explored in Robinson’s article (2013) on the significance of graffiti in Barcelona. Ambiguous or multi-layered imagery is common in the European medieval period, for instance, where images may express visual puns. An artist might playfully portray himself (or others) in mythological or Biblical scenes in a manner undetectable to those unfamiliar with his visage, giving the work both public and personal significance.
Art creates sites of activity
"Art establishes settings for action, framing architectural or open air spaces used for gatherings, public events, or collective action. Large-scale or monumental installations, such as memorials, create sites for the re-enactment of shared memories. Visual art can help to create a ritual setting by setting it apart, distinguishing ritual space from quotidian contexts; art may also help to set the scene through references to liturgical narratives."
"the choice of content, style and placement for such imagery whether theological and mythological, naturalistic or erotic, or geometrical may have helped create appropriate spaces for particular activities or social relationships."
Art is participatory
Art creates representational models for social relations
Art as cultural capital
Art also represents cultural capital concentrated, privileged access to items of value. In this sense, art can be a vocabulary for the shared habitus of members of the same social class, a tangible yet dynamic means for relating or dividing groups. This may often be simply through shared styles or ways of doing things. Farbstein (2013), for example, shows how small prehistoric communities creatively formulated different artistic representations as part of creating local networks of shared identity. In class-stratified societies or power-laden colonial relations, art has the capacity to unite, divide, or position people (Bourdieu 1984), since not all people are equally able to decode or to appreciate art and since art may be used to encode values privileging dominant groups. Herring (2013) eloquently traces the ways that Andean art has been appropriated, and misunderstood, in the unfolding discourses of Western Modernist art history. Architectural styles provide a particularly prominent way of asserting cultural capital; in recent European and American history, for example, there have been two architectures of power: the Classical and the Gothic. Both were deliberately revived and reworked to be widely used in public buildings of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (Figure 11), asserting institutional legitimacy by evoking the imagined splendours of a Classical or medieval past. Maya art is similarly well-known for evoking a world of privilege and power surrounding elites and their entourages. Evidence increasingly suggests that Maya elites were in some cases also the artisans. Inomata argues that craft production by elites during the Classic Period ‘... was at once a highly political act closely tied to power and an expression of elites ascribing to cultural and aesthetic values’ (2007, 137). He suggests that the willingness of high-status individuals to engage in demanding craft production work is evidence of their commitment to cultural ideals. Figure 12 shows a relief panel depicting a ruler in full regalia. Both the personae represented
and the creation, control and use of such objects tied high status people to a world of symbolic capital. Virtually all ancient civilisations, from the Egyptians through the Incas, engaged in a similar materialisation of the cultural capital of their rulers in large-scale or finely-worked art.
Comments
Post a Comment